Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:42:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:42:29 -0500 Received: from ns.netrox.net ([64.118.231.130]:62872 "EHLO smtp01.netrox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:42:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit From: Robert Love To: Con Kolivas Cc: David Lang , linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <200212231241.01049.conman@kolivas.net> References: <200212231241.01049.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1040611954.2129.67.camel@icbm> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 22 Dec 2002 21:52:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 21 On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 20:40, Con Kolivas wrote: > The current osdl hardware uses ext3 in the default journalling mode. Trying > different filesystems is something I have had planned for a while. When I get > the hardware sorted out as I need it to do this I will post some results > where comparisons can be made. One thing I have found in doing low-latency research is the impact of ext3 over ext2. There is a periodic blip of high latency with ext3 not seen in ext2. Presumably due to the journal writeback of ext3. It was not huge but a measurable increase. This was on 2.4, so I am curious how improved it is on 2.5. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/