Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753165AbaKZPh4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:37:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32883 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbaKZPhx (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:37:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:37:33 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: David Hildenbrand , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Reenable might_sleep() checks for might_fault() when atomic Message-ID: <20141126153732.GA10568@redhat.com> References: <1416915806-24757-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141126070258.GA25523@redhat.com> <20141126110504.511b733a@thinkpad-w530> <20141126151729.GB9612@redhat.com> <5475F218.4050207@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5475F218.4050207@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:30:32PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 26.11.2014 um 16:17 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:05:04AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>> What's the path you are trying to debug? > >> > >> Well, we had a problem where we held a spin_lock and called > >> copy_(from|to)_user(). We experienced very random deadlocks that took some guy > >> almost a week to debug. The simple might_sleep() check would have showed this > >> error immediately. > > > > > This must have been a very old kernel. > > A modern kernel will return an error from copy_to_user. > > I disagree. copy_to_user will not return while holding a spinlock, because it does not know! How should it? > See: spin_lock will call preempt_disable, but thats a no-op for a non-preempt kernel. So the mere fact that we hold a spin_lock is not known by any user access function. (or others). No? > > Christian > > Well might_sleep() merely checks preempt count and irqs_disabled too. If you want debugging things to trigger, you need to enable a bunch of config options. That's not new. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/