Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753052AbaKZVdq (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:33:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:45446 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752898AbaKZVdo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:33:44 -0500 From: Kevin Hilman To: Alexander Kochetkov Cc: Wolfram Sang , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] omap: i2c: don't check bus state IP rev3.3 and earlier References: <20141124210809.GG2817@atomide.com> <1416867655-22232-1-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <20141125141924.GD1843@katana> <7E0A0B24-91D5-41A4-B007-004C5965D0D7@gmail.com> <7hvbm3jdq1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <65BAE81D-E894-48EB-B5A0-0D0FFB9B448F@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:33:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <65BAE81D-E894-48EB-B5A0-0D0FFB9B448F@gmail.com> (Alexander Kochetkov's message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:26:10 +0300") Message-ID: <7hvbm1d4ui.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Kochetkov writes: > 25 нояб. 2014 г., в 22:13, Kevin Hilman написал(а): > >> I'll test your patch on all my OMAP boards. Put whatever debug output >> you want, and I'll send you links to all the boot output. > > Hello, Kevin! > > I've sent the patch[1]. Could you be so kind to run it on all your OMAP boards? > Thank you very much! > It is not urgent at all. Done. Built for omap2plus_defconfig, boot reports for all my OMAP boards here: http://people.linaro.org/~khilman/tmp/next-20141126-1-g760388ee02e4/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/ > What is the preferred way for giving patches for you (for future)? Email is fine. I have things fully automated for primary upstream trees (mainline, linux-next, stable, etc.) but for stuff like this, I can trigger one-off tests. However, if Tony wants to have a branch (besides the one already goes to linux-next) which I would add to the automation cycle, I'm willing to do that. > I have one more fixes for i2c-omap (I think final). > I don't want to break tests anymore. > > And I found, that n900 boot test PASS, but in fact it doesn't[2]. > [2] http://status.armcloud.us/boot/omap3-n900/job/next/kernel/next-20141124/defconfig/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/ Right. For these boot tests, PASS means it got to a userspace shell, which it did. The kernel got some warnings etc. during boot, but it still booted up to a shell. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/