Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:23:29 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:40716 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:22:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Athlon-SMP compiles & runs. inline fns honored. To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:54:50 +0000 (GMT) Cc: tleete@mountain.net (Tom Leete), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), andre@linux-ide.org (Andre Hedrick), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A85B2C9.56F7221D@mandrakesoft.com> from "Jeff Garzik" at Feb 10, 2001 04:29:45 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Ouch. What about un-inlining in_interrupt() for all SMP cases? Reduces > code size just a bit, and function calls aren't very expensive on SMP > machines IMHO... (and as a side effect solves this problem...) Call, conditional branch, call is pretty expensive and thats what most in_interrupt and small constant memcpy/memset paths are - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/