Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751768AbaK0PjG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:39:06 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:64886 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751695AbaK0PjD (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:39:03 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,470,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="644601318" Message-ID: <1417102739.5858.112.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] UBI: Fastmap: Ensure that all fastmap work is done upon WL shutdown From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Richard Weinberger Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:38:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1416835236-25185-4-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1416835236-25185-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1416835236-25185-4-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 14:20 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > ...otherwise the deferred work might run after datastructures > got freed and corrupt memory. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger > --- > drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c > index 7f135df..cb2e571 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c > @@ -2041,6 +2041,9 @@ static void protection_queue_destroy(struct ubi_device *ubi) > void ubi_wl_close(struct ubi_device *ubi) > { > dbg_wl("close the WL sub-system"); > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_FASTMAP > + flush_work(&ubi->fm_work); > +#endif If you are using the work infrastructure implemented in wl.c, then fastmap work should be no different to any other work. And we do flush all works in 'shutdown_work()'. The fastmap work should be flushed there too. I think we discussed this already - there should be one single queue of works, managed by the same set of functions, all flushed in the same place, one-by-one... Obviously, there is some misunderstanding. This looks like lack of separation and misuse of layering. I am missing explanations why I am wrong... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/