Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751374AbaK0VwX (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:52:23 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:64733 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750952AbaK0VwU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:52:20 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, vinod.koul@intel.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com, Tony Lindgren , Mark Brown , chris@printf.net, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: edma: Rename header file for dmaengine filter function definition Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:52:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4859328.eEV7jzKEaA@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54777174.4070203@ti.com> References: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <3300340.ou8f7H2hIc@wuerfel> <54777174.4070203@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:wMwH+rn/O7/e11eTcQFtsF22av0Pl4szbFuLe975Nj9 dSfm1nUkv9joHdf1NyV+bYbxQCY2ZAcm1WgeFeO9yr18Kw2l3x q1AzlNorYZMZRHAWnh19YaItOcWAUpHVC+I5RP9tH4Xdd8ofic Rm6mMJtxzTT8KWHrcK+r9zGNTs3GSBSeRvvuljuY+IwQbU3m0c pSWvdoXeNMdauq7I778IMZLU+4UlaUcRZYzQxnUsb4/H1OwoFv Zx35fkhvC+HZ9w/ZjID7jtepwZBq0T67iCoh7azaJQDoRSvx3N cm/+gQdnJZBGGEWiE3ySC7OU/Cd6vhPv/pT+MAVoJD+xM3kyIu Szb43/aOQ0t4H350zz3s= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 27 November 2014 20:46:12 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > I see. With this series I did not planed to fix all edma related issues, just > as a start clean up the related header files. I would rather not add fixes to > mmc, spi, etc drivers since while you have valid point it is not in the scope > of this series. > Can we do the changes you are suggesting in an incremental manner? Sure, but I'd leave the existing filter function declaration alone then and not move it, since we wouldn't want to keep it in the long run. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/