Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750926AbaK0WeH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:34:07 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com ([209.85.192.52]:41870 "EHLO mail-qg0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750816AbaK0WeF (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:34:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1803282.Wzz7IausxS@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1803282.Wzz7IausxS@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:34:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code From: Ulf Hansson To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alan Stern , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PM list , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Bjorn Helgaas , Kevin Hilman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [...] > That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good > question. In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that > don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form. However, it > may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough, > because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special > support. We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that > gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a > broad consensus on that. That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans. Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/