Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:17:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:16:58 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:65292 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:16:48 -0500 Subject: Re: Where are you going with 2.4.x? To: akorud@polynet.lviv.ua Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:17:26 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1394806431.20010211181744@polynet.lviv.ua> from "Andriy Korud" at Feb 11, 2001 06:17:44 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I've installed 2.4.x there. Just immedualtely I've noticed performance > improve, responce time improve. That is good news > BUT: All kernels prior to 2.1.4-ac8 hangs during first few hours of > work on heavy disk (Mylex) activity. Ok Im glad to know we have made some progress there > 2.1.4-ac8 was the first kernel which was able to work nore then 24 > hours. But on 26'th our of work it crashed with: > > Kernel panic: Aiee:, killing interrupt handler! > In interrupt handler - not syncing What is the oops data before the kernel panic. I need that to debug the driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x<74 ? > Can I know your thoughts about target market of 2.4.x kernel? I assume > that the goal is to make it feature-rich multimedia desktop system? And a rock solid server and anything else people want it to be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/