Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751176AbaK1LRt (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:17:49 -0500 Received: from smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.1.3]:52260 "EHLO smarthost01b.mail.zen.net.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750961AbaK1LRs (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:17:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1417173456.1845.3.camel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] ARM: kprobes: enable OPTPROBES for ARM 32 From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Wang Nan , will.deacon@arm.com, taras.kondratiuk@linaro.org, ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk, cl@linux.com, rabin@rab.in, davem@davemloft.net, lizefan@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:17:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20141128111327.GR3836@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1416551751-50846-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1416551751-50846-3-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1417099007.2041.6.camel@linaro.org> <5477E82A.3020208@hitachi.com> <1417169308.1845.1.camel@linaro.org> <20141128111327.GR3836@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.122.217] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 11:13 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:08:28AM +0000, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:12 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > (2014/11/27 23:36), Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > [...] > > > > I thought it good to see what sort of benefits this code achieves, > > > > especially as it could grow quite complex over time, and the cost of > > > > that versus the benefit should be considered. > > > > > > I don't think it's so complex. It's actually cleanly separated. > > > However, ARM tree should have arch/arm/kernel/kprobe/ dir, > > > since there are too many kprobe related files under arch/arm/kernel/ ... > > > > Yes, that does seem like a good idea. Or rather a 'probes' directory to > > also include uprobes as that shares a lot of code with kprobes. > > If you want to do this, then please make it arch/arm/probes rather than > making the directory tree deeper than it needs to be. Yes, good point. -- Tixy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/