Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751796AbaK1NnH (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:43:07 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]:55230 "EHLO mail-ob0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685AbaK1NnD (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:43:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20141128131425.GA23622@developer> References: <1417097577-3548-1-git-send-email-edubezval@gmail.com> <20141128111824.533c4641@jawa> <20141128131425.GA23622@developer> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:13:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] thermal: cpu_cooling: check for the readiness of cpufreq layer From: Viresh Kumar To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: Lukasz Majewski , Linux PM , Lukasz Majewski , LKML , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-samsung-soc , Zhang Rui , Rob Herring Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28 November 2014 at 18:44, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Well, I wouldn't say unfortunately, but fortunately! :-) +1 :) > However, I would prefer, at least to what comes to deferring, to update > the drivers altogether with the inclusion of the check in cpu cooling. > This way the change in behavior is atomic, in terms of commit changes. > > Viresh, if you don't mind, I will merge your patch 04/26 into this one. Sure, go ahead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/