Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:21:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:21:28 -0500 Received: from c16688.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.54]:30860 "EHLO mail.kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:21:26 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Con Kolivas Reply-To: conman@kolivas.net To: scott@thomasons.org, Robert Love , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:29:23 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200212200850.32886.conman@kolivas.net> <1040341293.2521.71.camel@phantasy> <200212241626.26478.scott@thomasons.org> In-Reply-To: <200212241626.26478.scott@thomasons.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200212251829.33553.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2924 Lines: 90 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 09:26 am, scott thomason wrote: > On Thursday 19 December 2002 05:41 pm, Robert Love wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:18, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > That is too often not the case. > > > > I knew you would say that! > > > > > I can get the desktop machine working about as comfortably > > > as 2.4.19 with: > > > > > > # echo 10 > max_timeslice > > > # echo 0 > prio_bonus_ratio > > > > > > ie: disabling all the fancy new scheduler features :( > > > > > > Dropping max_timeslice fixes the enormous stalls which happen > > > when an interactive process gets incorrectly identified as a > > > cpu hog. (OK, that's expected) > > My experiences to add to the pot...I started by booting 2.5.52-mm2 and > launching KDE3. I have a dual AMD MP2000+, 1GB RAM, with most of the > data used below on striped/RAID0 ATA/133 drives. Taking Andrew's > advice, I created a continuous load with: > > while [ 1 ]; do ( make -j4 clean; make -j4 bzImage ); done > > ...in a kernel tree, then sat down for a leisurely email and web > cruising session. After about fifteen minutes, it became apparent I > wasn't suffering any interactive slowdown. So I increased the load: > > while [ 1 ]; do ( make -j8 clean; make -j8 bzImage ); done > while [ 1 ]; do ( cp dump1 dump2; rm dump2; sync ); done > > ...where file "dump1" is 100MB. Now we're seeing some impact :) > > To combat this I tried: > > echo 3000 > starvation_limit > echo 4 > interactive_delta > echo 200 max_timeslice > echo 20 min_timeslice > > This works pretty well. The "spinning envelope" on the email monitor > of gkrellm actually corresponds quite nicely with the actual feel of > my system, so after awhile, I just sat back and observed it. Both the > tactile response and the gkrellm obervations show this: it's common > to experience maybe a .1--.3 second lag every 2 or 3 seconds with > this load, with maybe the odd .5 second lag occurring once or twice a > minute. Watching the compile job in the background scroll by, I > noticed that there are times when it comes to a dead stop. The next > step, I guess, needs to be a ConTest with the final settings... > > child_penalty: 95 > > exit_weight: 3 > > interactive_delta: 4 > > max_sleep_avg: 2000 > > max_timeslice: 300 > > min_timeslice: 10 > > parent_penalty: 100 > > prio_bonus_ratio: 25 > > starvation_limit: 3000 Scott These don't correspond to your values listed above. Typo? Con -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+CV5XF6dfvkL3i1gRAn+7AJ0Qq0oEo0LE2GG1jpju4cHqH+k6/QCfV1AU /7JI1ApZoQYwyBmFpH/50FY= =MAZ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/