Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751826AbaK2WIl (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:08:41 -0500 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:28472 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751304AbaK2WIk (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:08:40 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 104.193.169.186 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/6a4OORvzUuExIs1Raflij Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:06:19 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Alexander Kochetkov Cc: Kevin Hilman , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c: omap: TEST: do IP reset during probe. Message-ID: <20141129220619.GZ2817@atomide.com> References: <1416685634-5864-3-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <1417028722-29306-1-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <7hzjbdd57j.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <20141128221350.GW2817@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Alexander Kochetkov [141128 15:27]: > Hello, Tony! > > I just want to know, is multimaster i2c feature is interesting for TI SOC, > so I could send another patches? Sure and thanks for looking into fixing things. > Or it's better to leave the thing without changes, as current single master version > well tested and work? Well once the fixes are in, I don't see any reason to not add multimaster support. > Also I have a draft version of mixed multimaster/slave version. But it could introduce new bugs. > Are we ready for that? Thats because IP behavior, sometimes, doesn't correspond to TRMs[4][5]. > It's the one of strange IP I ever seen on TI SOC. And TRM not as detailed as DSP TRMs. I think we can pretty easily test the i2c support before things get merged. I guess it should then be possible to loop two i2c controllers and run automated tests on them :) > Looks, like you haven't seen my response in another thread[1]. > So, duplicate it here. Sorry I guess I forgot to reply, let me know if I still missed something. I'll give your two fixes a try on Monday hopefully. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/