Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:29:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:29:55 -0500 Received: from c16688.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.54]:48785 "EHLO mail.kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:29:52 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Con Kolivas Reply-To: conman@kolivas.net To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.53 with contest Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 10:37:45 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200212261038.04015.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8335 Lines: 187 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here are some contest results using osdl hardware: Uniprocessor: noload: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 70.0 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.50 [5] 69.9 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.51 [2] 69.8 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.52 [3] 70.2 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.53 [7] 70.1 96 0 0 1.05 cacherun: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 67.4 99 0 0 1.01 2.5.50 [5] 67.3 99 0 0 1.01 2.5.51 [2] 67.2 99 0 0 1.01 2.5.52 [3] 67.5 99 0 0 1.01 2.5.53 [7] 67.6 99 0 0 1.01 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28 2.5.50 [5] 84.8 79 17 19 1.27 2.5.51 [2] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28 2.5.52 [3] 84.4 79 17 19 1.26 2.5.53 [7] 86.9 77 18 21 1.30 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 106.1 82 2 9 1.59 2.5.50 [5] 107.5 81 3 9 1.61 2.5.51 [7] 107.0 81 3 9 1.60 2.5.52 [3] 109.8 81 2 8 1.64 2.5.53 [7] 107.4 81 3 9 1.61 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 184.8 70 3 8 2.77 2.5.50 [5] 189.5 61 4 9 2.84 2.5.51 [7] 163.7 67 3 8 2.45 2.5.52 [3] 161.4 69 3 8 2.42 2.5.53 [7] 151.0 69 3 8 2.26 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 127.4 57 14 13 1.91 2.5.50 [5] 142.6 54 19 14 2.14 2.5.51 [7] 125.6 58 14 12 1.88 2.5.52 [7] 120.9 60 13 12 1.81 2.5.53 [7] 113.9 63 12 12 1.71 io_other: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 97.4 75 7 11 1.46 2.5.50 [5] 106.9 69 10 11 1.60 2.5.51 [7] 105.1 69 9 11 1.57 2.5.52 [7] 94.9 76 7 10 1.42 2.5.53 [7] 99.5 73 8 10 1.49 read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 88.2 80 15 6 1.32 2.5.50 [5] 88.5 80 15 7 1.33 2.5.51 [2] 88.4 80 15 7 1.32 2.5.52 [3] 88.1 80 15 7 1.32 2.5.53 [7] 88.2 80 15 6 1.32 list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 81.4 85 0 8 1.22 2.5.50 [5] 81.2 85 0 8 1.22 2.5.51 [2] 80.8 85 0 8 1.21 2.5.52 [3] 81.0 86 0 9 1.21 2.5.53 [7] 81.5 85 0 9 1.22 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 98.1 76 43 2 1.47 2.5.50 [5] 98.3 76 44 2 1.47 2.5.51 [7] 99.3 76 45 2 1.49 2.5.52 [3] 100.0 78 45 2 1.50 2.5.53 [7] 98.7 80 44 2 1.48 Faster compile times in io_load and xtar_load compared to 2.5.52 SMP: noload: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [6] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09 2.5.50 [5] 39.3 180 0 0 1.09 2.5.51 [3] 39.6 180 0 0 1.09 2.5.52 [7] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09 2.5.53 [7] 39.4 181 0 0 1.09 cacherun: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [6] 36.6 194 0 0 1.01 2.5.50 [5] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01 2.5.51 [3] 36.5 195 0 0 1.01 2.5.52 [7] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01 2.5.53 [7] 36.6 194 0 0 1.01 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [6] 50.0 141 11 52 1.38 2.5.50 [5] 47.8 148 10 46 1.32 2.5.51 [3] 50.5 139 12 54 1.39 2.5.52 [7] 48.7 144 10 49 1.34 2.5.53 [7] 47.4 149 9 44 1.31 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 1d3 [1] 57.3 164 1 10 1.58 2.5.49 [5] 53.8 161 1 10 1.49 2.5.50 [5] 54.6 157 1 10 1.51 2.5.51 [7] 58.2 158 1 10 1.61 2.5.52 [7] 56.1 161 1 10 1.55 2.5.53 [7] 56.2 159 1 10 1.55 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 72.9 132 1 10 2.01 2.5.50 [5] 116.2 103 2 10 3.21 2.5.51 [7] 104.8 124 2 10 2.89 2.5.52 [7] 83.1 138 1 9 2.29 2.5.53 [7] 82.9 129 1 9 2.29 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 75.5 110 9 18 2.09 2.5.50 [5] 87.6 102 14 22 2.42 2.5.51 [7] 84.6 102 13 21 2.34 2.5.52 [7] 73.1 111 10 19 2.02 2.5.53 [7] 80.0 104 12 21 2.21 io_other: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 64.2 130 8 19 1.77 2.5.50 [5] 59.3 139 7 18 1.64 2.5.51 [7] 64.5 134 7 18 1.78 2.5.52 [7] 75.1 120 10 21 2.07 2.5.53 [7] 73.6 123 10 21 2.03 read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 49.1 152 5 7 1.36 2.5.50 [5] 49.3 151 5 7 1.36 2.5.51 [3] 48.5 154 5 7 1.34 2.5.52 [7] 49.4 151 5 7 1.36 2.5.53 [7] 50.7 151 5 7 1.40 list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20 2.5.50 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20 2.5.51 [3] 43.5 167 0 8 1.20 2.5.52 [7] 43.2 167 0 9 1.19 2.5.53 [7] 43.7 166 0 9 1.21 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.49 [5] 62.5 145 35 3 1.73 2.5.50 [5] 63.3 141 36 3 1.75 2.5.51 [7] 62.6 148 38 3 1.73 2.5.52 [7] 63.5 148 38 3 1.75 2.5.53 [7] 63.2 144 37 3 1.75 Small plus here, minus there, no major change in SMP results compared to 2.5.52 Con -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+CkFOF6dfvkL3i1gRAhHTAKCDlP8wKV1VLgmBuKcZuSc4WdfU4ACeMbcp CRNV51mhYF0NVYb5lxZVQBo= =nxlk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/