Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 01:40:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 01:40:50 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:54730 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 01:40:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 17:48:21 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: torvalds@transmeta.com Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] 2.5 fast poll on ppc64 Message-ID: <20021226064821.GA21628@krispykreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1198 Lines: 42 Hi, I was unable to boot 2.5-BK on ppc64 and narrowed it down to the fast poll patch. I found: offsetof(struct poll_list, entries) == 12 but sizeof(struct poll_list) == 16 This means pp+1 did not match up with pp->entries. Im not sure what the alignment requirements are for a zero length struct (ie is this a compiler bug) but the following patch fixes the problem and also changes ->len to a long to ensure 8 byte alignment of ->entries on 64bit archs. Anton ===== fs/select.c 1.15 vs edited ===== --- 1.15/fs/select.c Sat Dec 21 20:42:41 2002 +++ edited/fs/select.c Thu Dec 26 17:31:16 2002 @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ struct poll_list { struct poll_list *next; - int len; + long len; struct pollfd entries[0]; }; @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ walk->next = pp; walk = pp; - if (copy_from_user(pp+1, ufds + nfds-i, + if (copy_from_user(pp->entries, ufds + nfds-i, sizeof(struct pollfd)*pp->len)) { err = -EFAULT; goto out_fds; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/