Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:23:11 +0000
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why not make kdbus use CUSE?
Message-ID: <20141201142311.37c81ff1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20141129063416.GE32286@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
References: <20141129063416.GE32286@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
Organization: Intel Corporation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

> told quite plainly that such distributions are not worth consideration. If kdbus
> is merged despite concerns about security and backward compatibility, could we
> at least have the shim moved to libc netural place, like Linus' tree?

I would expect any other libc would fork the shim anyway (or just not
bother with systemd in most cases).

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/