Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:51:26 -0800
From: =?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree
References: <1417459352-23401-1-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
 <7088901.UGmPabvHQ0@wuerfel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7088901.UGmPabvHQ0@wuerfel>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Message-ID: <71b9e172438946a5ba74efb430d1418c@BN1AFFO11FD060.protection.gbl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 10:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2014 10:42:32 Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > +       usb_phy0: usb-phy@0 {
> > +               compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
> > +               #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +       };
> >  };
> 
> As discussed in an unrelated thread today, please drop the "@0" in the
> node name, since the device has no 'reg' property.

What is the best practice for naming such nodes then? On these boards
it's not the case, but Zynq has two USB cores. So, there may be DTs that
will have two phys in there. Would we just do 'usb-phy-0'?

	Thanks,
	Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/