Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932838AbaLAXO2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:14:28 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52748 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932408AbaLAXO1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:14:27 -0500 Message-ID: <547CF650.4070907@suse.de> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:14:24 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Organization: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?U8O2cmVuIEJyaW5rbWFubg==?= CC: Michal Simek , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter Crosthwaite , Ola Jeppson Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree References: <1417459352-23401-1-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <547CCEE3.6020806@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 01.12.2014 um 23:56 schrieb Sören Brinkmann: > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 01:24PM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 09:26PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am 01.12.2014 um 19:42 schrieb Soren Brinkmann: >>>> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts | 10 ++++++++++ >>>> 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi >>>> index ce2ef5bec4f2..9ed60938f301 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi > [...] >>>> @@ -324,6 +344,6 @@ >>>> reg = <0xf8005000 0x1000>; >>>> reset = <0>; >>>> timeout-sec = <10>; >>>> - }; >>>> + } ; >>>> }; >>>> }; >>> >>> Unrelated accidental change here though. :) > > Since a v2 is needed now, does this really require a dedicated patch to > fix this bogus space here or do we just look the other way? Sorry, I don't understand the question: If as you say a v2 is needed, why knowingly introduce a space between } and ; in your patch? Maybe I'm missing something or you're looking at the patch in reverse...? Andreas -- SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/