Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932567AbaLBRxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:53:09 -0500 Received: from mail-bn1on0090.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.90]:50273 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751916AbaLBRxH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:53:07 -0500 Message-ID: <547DFC30.304@opensource.altera.com> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:51:44 -0600 From: Thor Thayer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Rutland CC: "bp@alien8.de" , "dougthompson@xmission.com" , "m.chehab@samsung.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "galak@codeaurora.org" , "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "dinguyen@opensource.altera.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "tthayer.linux@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv5 5/5] arm: dts: Add Altera L2 Cache and OCRAM EDAC References: <1415751263-1830-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <1415751263-1830-6-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <546BB27A.20405@opensource.altera.com> <547CD3ED.1080804@opensource.altera.com> <20141202150118.GM23671@leverpostej> In-Reply-To: <20141202150118.GM23671@leverpostej> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [64.129.157.38] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN1PR02CA0029.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.56.29) To BLUPR03MB117.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.212.15) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB117; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB117; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0413C9F1ED X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6049001)(6009001)(164054003)(189002)(377454003)(53754006)(479174003)(43784003)(199003)(24454002)(51704005)(31966008)(23746002)(110136001)(101416001)(21056001)(64126003)(50466002)(42186005)(33656002)(4396001)(102836001)(65956001)(47776003)(20776003)(64706001)(66066001)(83506001)(15975445006)(40100003)(50986999)(86362001)(65816999)(76176999)(54356999)(15202345003)(19580405001)(19580395003)(87976001)(92726001)(92566001)(19300405004)(68736005)(105586002)(95666004)(106356001)(107046002)(93886004)(122386002)(62966003)(120916001)(77156002)(46102003)(97736003)(99396003)(77096005)(562404015);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BLUPR03MB117;H:[137.57.160.203];FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:0;LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB117; X-OriginatorOrg: opensource.altera.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/02/2014 09:01 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Thor, > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:47:41PM +0000, Thor Thayer wrote: >> Hi Boris, >> >> On 11/18/2014 02:56 PM, Thor Thayer wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On 11/11/2014 06:14 PM, tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote: >>>> From: Thor Thayer >>>> >>>> Adding the device tree entries and bindings needed to support >>>> the Altera L2 cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC. This patch relies upon >>>> an earlier patch to declare and setup On-chip RAM properly. >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg51117.html >>> >>> Any comments on these devicetree additions? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Thor >>>> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer >>>> --- >>>> v2: Remove OCRAM declaration and reference prior patch. >>>> >>>> v3-5: No Change >>>> --- >> >> I originally submitted this series on November 11, 2014. >> >> I haven't received any comments or ACKs on the device tree patch portion >> (patch 5 of 5). According to >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt, if the patch >> hasn't been Acked after a couple of weeks, the maintainer can pull the >> changes if they are comfortable with those changes. > > Apologies it has taken so long for this to be looked at. Unfortunately > my inbox is overflowing (as are all of ours) and things fall by the > wayside. I am sorry that this has lead to such a delayed response, > especially given that it was negative. > > I'll try to keep up with this a bit more actively. > > Thanks, > Mark. > Hi Mark, Thank you for reviewing this. I have seen how busy the device tree ML is so I completely understand. You have reviewed previous patch revisions in this series - thanks. I thought that I'd addressed most of the issues (in some cases by explaining my implementation) and since I hadn't heard anything, I assumed there weren't concerns. Thanks again, Thor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/