Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 01:17:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 01:17:49 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:55766 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 01:17:49 -0500 Message-ID: <3E0D43F8.90A9E683@digeo.com> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:26:00 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.52 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: conman@kolivas.net CC: linux kernel mailing list , Paolo Ciarrocchi Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] vm swappiness with contest References: <200212271646.01487.conman@kolivas.net> <200212272100.44345.conman@kolivas.net> <200212281716.50535.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2002 06:26:01.0152 (UTC) FILETIME=[FDA39400:01C2AE39] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 617 Lines: 17 Con Kolivas wrote: > > ... > Is there something about the filesystem layer or elsewhere in the kernel that > could decay or fragment over time that only a reboot can fix? This would seem > to be a bad thing. Not much that I can think of. Apart from a damn great memory leak somewhere. Suggest you perform a few runs, keeping an eye on the vm statistics after each run. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/