Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751843AbaLCT5K (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:57:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:52802 "EHLO mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751273AbaLCT5I (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:57:08 -0500 From: Kevin Hilman To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc\@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Inki Dae , Tobias Jakobi , Daniel Drake , Andrzej Hajda , Tomasz Figa , Pankaj Dubey , Amit Daniel Kachhap , Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: Exynos: add support for sub-power domains References: <1416814256-24288-3-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com> <1417610024-29748-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <547F065A.5030505@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:57:05 -0800 In-Reply-To: <547F065A.5030505@samsung.com> (Marek Szyprowski's message of "Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:47:22 +0100") Message-ID: <7hvblsy0a6.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marek Szyprowski writes: > Hello, > > On 2014-12-03 13:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Hi Marek, >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Marek Szyprowski >> wrote: >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt >>> index abde1ea8a119..b884358ebb1a 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt >>> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Optional Properties: >>> - pclkN, clkN: Pairs of parent of input clock and input clock to the >>> devices in this power domain. Maximum of 4 pairs (N = 0 to 3) >>> are supported currently. >>> +- samsung,power-domain: phandle to a master power domain that the given domain >>> + is a part of >> For new DTSes I'd recommend using the generic "power-domains" only. > > I think that some consistency in dts style will be really an added > value. In my opinion for > all existing DTSes we should keep using 'samsung,power-domain' (even > for defining a parent > power domains) and for all new DTSes, the generic 'power-domains' > binding should be used. Or even better, convert the existing DTSs to use generic power-domain first, and then use generic ones going forward also. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/