Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752150AbaLCUGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:06:16 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:22758 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751124AbaLCUGO (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:06:14 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,508,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="632043275" Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:10:46 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: "David E. Box" Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, jdelvare@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, dianders@chromium.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, andrew@lunn.ch, sjg@chromium.org, markus.mayer@linaro.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, max.schwarz@online.de, skuribay@pobox.com, Romain.Baeriswyl@abilis.com, wenkai.du@intel.com, chiau.ee.chew@intel.com, alan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail PMIC I2C bus support Message-ID: <20141203161046.GC28857@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1411497626-7984-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <1417478973-25522-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <1417478973-25522-3-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1417478973-25522-3-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:09:33PM -0800, David E. Box wrote: > This patch implements an I2C bus sharing mechanism between the host and platform > hardware on select Intel BayTrail SoC platforms using the X-Powers AXP288 PMIC. > > On these platforms access to the PMIC must be shared with platform hardware. The > hardware unit assumes full control of the I2C bus and the host must request > access through a special semaphore. Hardware control of the bus also makes it > necessary to disable runtime pm to avoid interfering with hardware transactions. > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 12 +++ > drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 6 ++ > 4 files changed, 174 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > index 917c358..d2bfd88 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > @@ -464,6 +464,18 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module > will be called i2c-designware-pci. > > +config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL > + bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support" > + depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y Hmm, is there something preventing to compile this as module? What comes to the driver itself, no objections from me. Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/