Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752485AbaLCX6l (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:58:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:52914 "EHLO mail-wg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751124AbaLCX6j (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 18:58:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:58:37 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Linux Kernel , Richard Guy Briggs , Eric Paris , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Paul McKenney Subject: Re: [PATCH] context_tracking: Restore previous state in schedule_user Message-ID: <20141203235835.GE31369@lerouge> References: <20141203220836.GC31369@lerouge> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:18:41PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > It appears that some SCHEDULE_USER (asm for schedule_user) callers > in arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S are called from RCU kernel context, > and schedule_user will return in RCU user context. This causes RCU > warnings and possible failures. > > This is intended to be a minimal fix suitable for 3.18. > > Reported-by: Dave Jones > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > Cc: Fr?d?ric Weisbecker > Cc: Paul McKenney > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Ah, we sent it about at the same time :-) Might be too late for 3.18 though because it's not a regression. > --- > > Hi all- > > This is intended to be a suitable last-minute fix for the RCU issue that > Dave saw. > > Dave, can you confirm that this fixes it? > > Fr?d?ric, can you confirm that you think that this will have no effect > on correct callers of schedule_user and that will do the right thing > for incorrect callers of schedule_user? Yes it should be fine. > > I don't like the x86 asm that calls this at all, and I don't really > like the fragility of the mechanism is general, but I think that this > improves the situation enough to avoid problems in the short term. At best we should have only one call to user_enter() at the end of the syscall and exception path once we've completed everything (pending reschedule, tracing, signals, ...) instead of context tracking fixups on functions that can be called after syscall_trace_leave(), but that would impact the fastpath. Although it should be possible to tweak the slow path to do that... > > With the obvious warning added, I get: > > [ 0.751022] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.751937] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 72 at kernel/sched/core.c:2883 schedule_user+0xcf/0xe0() > [ 0.753477] Modules linked in: > [ 0.754089] CPU: 0 PID: 72 Comm: mount Not tainted 3.18.0-rc7+ #653 > [ 0.755258] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 > [ 0.757655] 0000000000000009 ffff880005c13f00 ffffffff81741dca ffff8800069f5a50 > [ 0.759228] 0000000000000000 ffff880005c13f40 ffffffff8108e781 0000000000000246 > [ 0.760758] 0000000000000000 00007fff970441c8 00007fff97043fd0 00007f67794ebcc8 > [ 0.762294] Call Trace: > [ 0.762775] [] dump_stack+0x46/0x58 > [ 0.763739] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xa0 > [ 0.764865] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 > [ 0.765958] [] schedule_user+0xcf/0xe0 > [ 0.766974] [] sysret_careful+0x19/0x1c > [ 0.768011] ---[ end trace 329f34db2b3be966 ]--- > > So, yes, we have a bug, and this could cause any number of strange > problems. > > kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 24beb9bb4c3e..39d9d95331b7 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -2874,10 +2874,14 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedule_user(void) > * or we have been woken up remotely but the IPI has not yet arrived, > * we haven't yet exited the RCU idle mode. Do it here manually until > * we find a better solution. Just need to fix the above comment. > + * > + * NB: There are buggy callers of this function. Ideally we > + * should warn if prev_state != IN_USER, but that will trigger > + * to frequently to make sense yet. It's not really the callers of this function that are buggy but the way we handled context tracking. > */ > - user_exit(); > + enum ctx_state prev_state = exception_enter(); > schedule(); > - user_enter(); > + exception_exit(prev_state); > } > #endif > > -- > 1.9.3 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/