Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753058AbaLDIlD (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 03:41:03 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:51746 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbaLDIlA (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 03:41:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1417682410.3744.1.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 03/12] drm: imx: imx-hdmi: convert imx-hdmi to drm_bridge mode From: Philipp Zabel To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Andy Yan , airlied@linux.ie, heiko@sntech.de, fabio.estevam@freescale.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Josh Boyer , Sean Paul , Inki Dae , Dave Airlie , Arnd Bergmann , Lucas Stach , Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com, djkurtz@google.com, ykk@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, Pawel Moll , mark.yao@rock-chips.com, Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com, Kumar Gala Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:40:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20141203163009.GG11285@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1417620408-30354-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <1417620566-30496-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com> <20141203153847.GC11285@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <547F3495.9070206@rock-chips.com> <1417623615.5124.19.camel@pengutronix.de> <20141203163009.GG11285@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Russell, Am Mittwoch, den 03.12.2014, 16:30 +0000 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 05:20:15PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > It would be better if the bind function would not have to care about > > platform resources, that should be handled in the probe function. I had > > a patch to move them: > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-May/059630.html > > > > Maybe you could incorporate something like this? > > Personally, I hate this idea. Having a two-layered setup means that > the when the bind() method is called, the state of struct imx_hdmi is > indeterminant. > > If it's called immediately from probe, most of the structure will be > zeroed, and only those members initialised by the probe function will > be set to non-zero values. > > However, if the HDMI interface has been previously bound, and is > subsequently re-bound, then the structure will most definitely no > longer be in a known state on the second bind() call. > > This is fragile. > > Now, people have tried to tell me that this isn't fragile, but, I now > have proof that it is as fragile as I fear. The component helper > doesn't yet have that many users, and already we have one user (okay, > it's not part of the mainline kernel - it's etnaviv) which contained > exactly this kind of bug: it expected its private structures to be > zeroed on the bind() call. > > So, I /really/ hate this idea. If you really want to do this, then > please ensure that the bind() call explicitly zeros the bits of the > struct which aren't initialised by the probe() call, so we know that > the driver will always start off with a known initial state. You are right, no I don't want this. When I initially wrote this patch I was under the impression that the memory allocated by devm_kzalloc in bind() wouldn't be freed on unbind(). I remember I stopped pursuing this patch when I got aware of the devres_open/close/remove_group dance in the component framework code, but somehow forgot to drop it altogether locally. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/