Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932698AbaLDQXG (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:23:06 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:29977 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932482AbaLDQXD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:23:03 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,516,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="618643408" From: "Liang, Kan" To: "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: "eranian@google.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "paulus@samba.org" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "namhyung@kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) Thread-Topic: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) Thread-Index: AQHQDkRfJnDNoBLJ7kWTuaSxvb8h+5x++RsAgACMFfD//4yQAIAAAvCAgACI3PA= Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:18:56 +0000 Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167E1F0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1417532814-26208-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <20141204142330.GB10406@krava.brq.redhat.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167D124@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20141204155142.GD18689@kernel.org> <20141204160213.GB18631@krava.brq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20141204160213.GB18631@krava.brq.redhat.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > Jiri Wrote: > > > > looks ok to me.. > > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right? > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter. > > > > > Peter? > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits. > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together. Hi Peter, I have verified that the V8 kernel part patch is compatible with both latest tip and latest perf/core. We don't need to rebase. The user perf tool for tip is not updated yet. We need to merge latest perf/core to tip before applying user part patch. Do you have more comments for the code? The latest kernel and user part codes are here. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/432 https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/396 Thanks, Kan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/