Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932678AbaLDSvW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:51:22 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:59416 "EHLO mail-ig0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932138AbaLDSvV (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:51:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [84.73.67.144] In-Reply-To: References: <1417533733-2289-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1417534582-2977-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20141202163506.GG18921@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <20141203143029.GF32117@phenom.ffwll.local> <20141204104228.GJ32117@phenom.ffwll.local> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:51:20 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout correctly From: Daniel Vetter To: John Stultz Cc: Chris Wilson , Intel Graphics Development , LKML , Daniel Vetter , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:16 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:42 PM, John Stultz wrote: >>> Sigh. So you're going to make me write a separate patch that moves it over? >> >> We've written it already, Imre posted the link to the old discussion: >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/187 >> >> But if the first attempt doesn't sufficiently stick I tend to chase >> the patches any more. But if you want to resurrect this I could ping >> Imre and ask him to pick it up again or you could rebase his patches. > > Well, last I saw the initial patch was buggy, no? I don't think I saw > it being resubmitted. I didn't see your reply in that thread nor in the v2 follow up at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136854294730957&w=2 Maybe I missed it, but response seems to have been lukewarm overall. >>> But still, I do see our change broke you here, so I'm not going to object. >> >> Ok, thanks I'll pull this in through drm-intel for 3.19 (3.18 is kinda >> done already I guess) with cc: stable. > > You probably should submit it for 3.18 and let Linus decide if its too > late. I've already gotten yelled at by Ingo for pushing patches in the > merge window that cc stable. Even if its out of a desire to let the > patches get wider testing, its something of a hot-button item for > folks. :) Oh I know, but if you count your regression rate in bugs-per-day you end up with different standards ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/