Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754772AbaLDUf7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:35:59 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com ([209.85.192.44]:64241 "EHLO mail-qg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753025AbaLDUf6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:35:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1417533733-2289-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1417534582-2977-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20141202163506.GG18921@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <20141203143029.GF32117@phenom.ffwll.local> <20141204104228.GJ32117@phenom.ffwll.local> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 12:35:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout correctly From: John Stultz To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Chris Wilson , Intel Graphics Development , LKML , Daniel Vetter , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:16 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:42 PM, John Stultz wrote: >>>> Sigh. So you're going to make me write a separate patch that moves it over? >>> >>> We've written it already, Imre posted the link to the old discussion: >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/187 >>> >>> But if the first attempt doesn't sufficiently stick I tend to chase >>> the patches any more. But if you want to resurrect this I could ping >>> Imre and ask him to pick it up again or you could rebase his patches. >> >> Well, last I saw the initial patch was buggy, no? I don't think I saw >> it being resubmitted. > > I didn't see your reply in that thread nor in the v2 follow up at > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136854294730957&w=2 Maybe I missed > it, but response seems to have been lukewarm overall. Ok, I wasn't cc'ed on the v2, thanks for the pointer. There's some general lukewarmness to all things jiffies, since getting rid of them has been a long term goal forever. But overall that patch set seemed ok (though I'm not a fan of macro generation of functions). But minor details.. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/