Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:59:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:59:16 -0500 Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122]:47827 "EHLO pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:59:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 12:12:27 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww...... Message-ID: <20021229171227.GA27402@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1081 Lines: 34 > Of course, this is little value if not possible to compare, so here > is the same done running a kernel 2.4.20, but still compiling the > same kernel : >From the .config, it looks like you have a P4. I'm not seeing that regression on K6/2 or P3 Xeon. k6/2 475 mhz applying patches 1-17 to linux-2.4.0.tar.bz2 and "make dep bzImage modules" with default options: 2.4.21-pre2aa2 1585 seconds 2.5.52bk5 1707 seconds 2.5.52bk8 1731 seconds 2.5.53-mm1 1744 seconds 2.5.53bk1 1702 seconds Quad P3 Xeon 700 mhz applying patches 1-19 to linux-2.4.0.tar.bz2 to build 4 2.4.19 kernels simultaneously: kernel average time to build 4 kernels. 2.4.20-rc4 728.9 seconds 2.4.20aa1 718.9 seconds 2.5.52bk7 713.8 seconds 2.5.53-mm1 717.8 seconds -- Randy Hron http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/