Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:35:48 -0800
From: Tristan Lelong <tristan@lelong.xyz>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: oleg.drokin@intel.com, andreas.dilger@intel.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, askb23@gmail.com, john.hammond@intel.com,
        gdonald@gmail.com, anhlq2110@gmail.com, fabio.falzoi84@gmail.com,
        oort10@gmail.com, agimenez@sysvalve.es, rupran@einserver.de,
        surya.seetharaman9@gmail.com, Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr,
        a.terekhov@gmail.com, liang.zhen@intel.com, vthakkar1994@gmail.com,
        amk@cray.com, srikrishanmalik@gmail.com, rd@radekdostal.com,
        bergwolf@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
        paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, tapaswenipathak@gmail.com,
        email@christophjaeger.info, uja.ornl@gmail.com, brilliantov@inbox.ru,
        dmitry.eremin@intel.com, HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning on LPROC_SEQ_FOPS
 macros
Message-ID: <20141205223548.GA5698@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1417766627-5232-1-git-send-email-tristan@lelong.xyz>
 <1417768091.2721.47.camel@perches.com>
 <20141205083741.GA5570@dunderer>
 <1417769047.2721.49.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1417769047.2721.49.camel@perches.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:44:07AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 00:37 -0800, Tristan Lelong wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:28:11AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 00:03 -0800, Tristan Lelong wrote:
> []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/lproc_fld.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/lproc_fld.c
> []
> > > > +	char name[80];
> []
> > > Why 80?  Is there no #define for this length?
> > > 
> > No, there is no define.
> > 
> > I thought about adding one, but several other files and structure
> > members in the lustre sources are using this specific value, and it
> > seemed like a modification to do in another patch.
> > 
> > Let me know if you feel I should do it in a patch serie.
> 
> No worries if it's not a new number.
> 
> It'd be nice if you would submit a new
> patch with a #define and a conversion
> to use the #define one day.
> 
> 

No worries, I'll be happy to submit a patch to fix this soon.

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/