Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 15:55:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 15:55:18 -0500 Received: from natsmtp01.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.81]:63935 "EHLO post.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 15:55:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 22:03:41 +0100 From: Dominik Brodowski To: Paul Rolland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.5.53 - Oops] CPU Frequency scaling Message-ID: <20021229210341.GA1657@brodo.de> References: <009d01c2af2b$24ecabe0$2101a8c0@witbe> <12349.1041189727@www40.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12349.1041189727@www40.gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 11498 Lines: 375 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Thanks for testing cpufreq - and sorry for that oops. The attached patches should resolve this problem. For further cpufreq updates, check http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq/advanced.html Dominik --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cpufreq-2.5.53-1-p4-1" [PATCH 2.5][RESEND] cpufreq: p4-clockmod bugfixes The "get current state" algorithm wasn't aware of the disable/enable bit, and the policy verification function wasn't aware of the N44 / O17 bug. Also, some unused code is removed. Dominik diff -ruN linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c --- linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c 2002-12-21 14:53:44.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c 2002-12-21 18:24:29.000000000 +0100 @@ -82,12 +82,17 @@ /* get current state */ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_THERM_CONTROL, l, h); - l = l >> 1; - l &= 0x7; - + if (l & 0x10) { + l = l >> 1; + l &= 0x7; + } else + l = DC_DISABLE; + if (l == newstate) { set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed); return 0; + } else if (l == DC_RESV) { + printk(KERN_ERR PFX "BIG FAT WARNING: currently in invalid setting\n"); } /* notifiers */ @@ -141,13 +146,18 @@ unsigned int i; unsigned int newstate = 0; unsigned int number_states = 0; + unsigned int minstate = 1; - if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq || !policy) + if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq || + !policy || !cpu_online(policy->cpu)) return -EINVAL; + if (has_N44_O17_errata) + minstate = 3; + if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) { - for (i=8; i>0; i--) + for (i=8; i>=minstate; i--) if ((policy->min <= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)) && (policy->max >= ((stock_freq / 8) * i))) { @@ -155,7 +165,7 @@ number_states++; } } else { - for (i=1; i<=8; i++) + for (i=minstate; i<=8; i++) if ((policy->min <= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)) && (policy->max >= ((stock_freq / 8) * i))) { @@ -164,25 +174,8 @@ } } - /* if (number_states == 1) */ - { - if (policy->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) { - for (i=0; icpu, newstate); - } - } - /* else { - if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE) { - min_state = newstate; - max_state = newstate + (number_states - 1); - } else { - max_state = newstate; - min_state = newstate - (number_states - 1); - } - } */ + cpufreq_p4_setdc(policy->cpu, newstate); + return 0; } @@ -190,17 +183,21 @@ static int cpufreq_p4_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { unsigned int number_states = 0; - unsigned int i; + unsigned int i = 1; - if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq || !policy) + if (!cpufreq_p4_driver || !stock_freq || + !policy || !cpu_online(policy->cpu)) return -EINVAL; - if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu)) - policy->cpu = CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, (stock_freq / 8), stock_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, + policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + + if (has_N44_O17_errata) + i = 3; - /* is there at least one state within limit? */ - for (i=1; i<=8; i++) + /* is there at least one state within the limit? */ + for (; i<=8; i++) if ((policy->min <= ((stock_freq / 8) * i)) && (policy->max >= ((stock_freq / 8) * i))) number_states++; @@ -209,6 +206,9 @@ return 0; policy->max = (stock_freq / 8) * (((unsigned int) ((policy->max * 8) / stock_freq)) + 1); + cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, + policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); return 0; } @@ -292,13 +292,14 @@ void __exit cpufreq_p4_exit(void) { - u32 l, h; + unsigned int i; if (cpufreq_p4_driver) { + for (i=0; i #include +#include +#include #include #include #include @@ -64,6 +66,41 @@ #endif __setup("notsc", tsc_setup); +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ +static unsigned long loops_per_jiffy_ref = 0; +static unsigned int ref_freq = 0; + +static int +loops_per_jiffy_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, + void *data) +{ + struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data; + + if (!loops_per_jiffy_ref) { + loops_per_jiffy_ref = cpu_data[freq->cpu].loops_per_jiffy; + ref_freq = freq->old; + } + + switch (val) { + case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE: + if (freq->old < freq->new) + cpu_data[freq->cpu].loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new); + break; + case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE: + if (freq->new < freq->old) + cpu_data[freq->cpu].loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy_ref, ref_freq, freq->new); + break; + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct notifier_block loops_per_jiffy_cpufreq_notifier_block = { + .notifier_call = loops_per_jiffy_cpufreq_notifier +}; +#endif + + int __init get_model_name(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { unsigned int *v; @@ -373,6 +410,16 @@ boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[i] &= c->x86_capability[i]; } + /* + * Update the per-CPU loops_per_jiffy count on CPU frequency + * transitions + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ + if (c == &boot_cpu_data) { + cpufreq_register_notifier(&loops_per_jiffy_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); + } +#endif + /* Init Machine Check Exception if available. */ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE mcheck_init(c); diff -ruN linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c --- linux-original/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c 2002-12-24 13:37:12.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c 2002-12-24 14:41:28.000000000 +0100 @@ -186,45 +186,45 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ +static unsigned long fast_gettimeoffset_ref = 0; +static unsigned long cpu_khz_ref = 0; +static unsigned int ref_freq = 0; + static int -time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, +tsc_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data) { struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data; - unsigned int i; - if (!cpu_has_tsc) + if (!use_tsc) return 0; + if (!fast_gettimeoffset_ref) { + fast_gettimeoffset_ref = fast_gettimeoffset_quotient; + cpu_khz_ref = cpu_khz; + ref_freq = freq->old; + } + switch (val) { case CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE: - if ((freq->old < freq->new) && - ((freq->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) || (freq->cpu == 0))) { - cpu_khz = cpufreq_scale(cpu_khz, freq->old, freq->new); - fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = cpufreq_scale(fast_gettimeoffset_quotient, freq->new, freq->old); + if (freq->old < freq->new) { + fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = cpufreq_scale(fast_gettimeoffset_ref, freq->new, ref_freq); + cpu_khz = cpufreq_scale(cpu_khz_ref, ref_freq, freq->new); } - for (i=0; icpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) || (freq->cpu == i)) - cpu_data[i].loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(cpu_data[i].loops_per_jiffy, freq->old, freq->new); break; - case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE: - if ((freq->new < freq->old) && - ((freq->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) || (freq->cpu == 0))) { - cpu_khz = cpufreq_scale(cpu_khz, freq->old, freq->new); - fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = cpufreq_scale(fast_gettimeoffset_quotient, freq->new, freq->old); + if (freq->new < freq->old) { + fast_gettimeoffset_quotient = cpufreq_scale(fast_gettimeoffset_ref, freq->new, ref_freq); + cpu_khz = cpufreq_scale(cpu_khz_ref, ref_freq, freq->new); } - for (i=0; icpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) || (freq->cpu == i)) - cpu_data[i].loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(cpu_data[i].loops_per_jiffy, freq->old, freq->new); break; } return 0; } -static struct notifier_block time_cpufreq_notifier_block = { - .notifier_call = time_cpufreq_notifier +static struct notifier_block tsc_cpufreq_notifier_block = { + .notifier_call = tsc_cpufreq_notifier }; #endif @@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ "0" (eax), "1" (edx)); printk("Detected %lu.%03lu MHz processor.\n", cpu_khz / 1000, cpu_khz % 1000); } -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ - cpufreq_register_notifier(&time_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) && !defined(CONFIG_SMP) + cpufreq_register_notifier(&tsc_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); #endif return 0; } diff -ruN linux-original/kernel/cpufreq.c linux/kernel/cpufreq.c --- linux-original/kernel/cpufreq.c 2002-12-24 13:38:25.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/kernel/cpufreq.c 2002-12-24 14:46:25.000000000 +0100 @@ -936,17 +936,27 @@ * adjust_jiffies - adjust the system "loops_per_jiffy" * * This function alters the system "loops_per_jiffy" for the clock - * speed change. Note that loops_per_jiffy is only updated if all - * CPUs are affected - else there is a need for per-CPU loops_per_jiffy - * values which are provided by various architectures. + * speed change. Note that loops_per_jiffy cannot be updated on SMP + * systems as each CPU might be scaled differently. So, use the arch + * per-CPU loops_per_jiffy value wherever possible. */ +#ifndef CONFIG_SMP +static unsigned long l_p_j_ref = 0; +static unsigned int l_p_j_ref_freq = 0; + static inline void adjust_jiffies(unsigned long val, struct cpufreq_freqs *ci) { + if (!l_p_j_ref_freq) { + l_p_j_ref = loops_per_jiffy; + l_p_j_ref_freq = ci->old; + } if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && ci->old < ci->new) || (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old > ci->new)) - if (ci->cpu == CPUFREQ_ALL_CPUS) - loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(loops_per_jiffy, ci->old, ci->new); + loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq, ci->new); } +#else +#define adjust_jiffies(...) +#endif /** --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/