Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754220AbaLHTlb (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:41:31 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.8]:65508 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbaLHTl3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:41:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1418067685.2058.27.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean' From: Paul Bolle To: Christoph Jaeger Cc: Daniel Borkmann , yann.morin.1998@free.fr, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:41:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5485F923.3090301@redhat.com> References: <1539c3778a0f3533942f69540a9b5b3d1f965bdc.1418003065.git.cj@linux.com> <1418064660.2058.11.camel@x220> <1418066039.2058.19.camel@x220> <5485F923.3090301@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2014 19:41:25.0398 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3CCDB60:01D0131E] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 20:16 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 12/08/2014 08:13 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 19:51 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > >> This doesn't apply on next-20141208. What tree did you base this on? > > > > I got it to apply on next-20141208 by dropping the hunk for > > arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/Kconfig and by making (trivial) context > > changes to the hunks for init/Kconfig and net/Kconfig. > > > > (My experience with actual maintainers is that they won't bother to do > > that. Anyhow, Kconfig is basically unmaintained. And I don't know which > > tree one should base ones Kconfig patches on.) > > Well, I guess if in doubt then this could go into Andrew's tree. :) > > > I'll muddle along... Checking this on the in tree defconfig files gave me a few hundred, it seems, errors like: net/switchdev/Kconfig:7: syntax error net/switchdev/Kconfig:6: unknown option "boolean" drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig:61: syntax error drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig:60: unknown option "boolean" drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:373: syntax error drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:372: unknown option "boolean" drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:386: syntax error drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:385: unknown option "boolean" drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:404: syntax error drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:403: unknown option "boolean" drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:418: syntax error drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig:417: unknown option "boolean" make[1]: *** [oldconfig] Error 1 make: *** [oldconfig] Error 2 I assume these are uses of "boolean" added by trees merged in next-20141208 after the tree that you based your patch on. Well, it seems the treewide "boolean" cleanup should be done first. Removing support for "boolean" could than be a second, separate step. Just to ease review. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/