Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754444AbaLHT4o (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:56:44 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:42077 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753514AbaLHT4l (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:56:41 -0500 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= To: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: wl1251: NVS firmware data Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:56:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.18.0-031800rc5-generic; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Dan Williams , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Ming Lei , Pavel Machek , "John W. Linville" , Grazvydas Ignotas , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Network Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Aaro Koskinen , Kalle Valo , Sebastian Reichel , David Gnedt References: <201411271506.20457@pali> <201412082036.14609@pali> <508290C6-B3D7-4E07-BE5E-EF6BDE568E92@holtmann.org> In-Reply-To: <508290C6-B3D7-4E07-BE5E-EF6BDE568E92@holtmann.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3380800.rBeIzVeWLx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201412082056.37353@pali> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart3380800.rBeIzVeWLx Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 08 December 2014 20:46:07 Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Pali, >=20 > >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday 06 December 2014 13:49:54 Pavel Machek > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: /** > >>>>>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>>>>> + * request_firmware_prefer_user: - prefer usermode > >>>>>>>>>> helper for loading firmware + * @firmware_p: > >>>>>>>>>> pointer to firmware image > >>>>>>>>>> + * @name: name of firmware file > >>>>>>>>>> + * @device: device for which firmware is being > >>>>>>>>>> loaded + * > >>>>>>>>>> + * This function works pretty much like > >>>>>>>>>> request_firmware(), but it prefer + * usermode > >>>>>>>>>> helper. If usermode helper fails then it fallback > >>>>>>>>>> to direct access. + * Usefull for dynamic or model > >>>>>>>>>> specific firmware data. + **/ > >>>>>>>>>> +int request_firmware_prefer_user(const struct > >>>>>>>>>> firmware **firmware_p, + > >>>>>>>>>> const char *name, struct device *device) +{ > >>>>>>>>>> + int ret; > >>>>>>>>>> + __module_get(THIS_MODULE); > >>>>>>>>>> + ret =3D _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, > >>>>>>>>>> device, + > >>>>>>>>>> FW_OPT_UEVENT > >>>>>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>>>>> | FW_OPT_PREFER_USER); + > >>>>>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>>>>> module_put(THIS_MODULE); + return ret; > >>>>>>>>>> +} > >>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_firmware_prefer_user); > >>>>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to introduce request_firmware_user() which > >>>>>>>>> only requests firmware from user space, and this > >>>>>>>>> way is simpler and more flexible since we have > >>>>>>>>> request_firmware_direct() already. > >>>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>>> Why would a driver care about what program provides > >>>>>>>> the firmware? It shouldn't at all, and we want to > >>>>>>>> get rid of the userspace firmware loader, not > >>>>>>>> encourage drivers to use it "exclusively" at all. > >>>>>>>=20 > >>>>>>> Do not remove it! Without userspace firmware loader it > >>>>>>> is impossible to load dynamic firmware files. > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> why is this dynamic in the first place. It does not > >>>>>> sound like dynamic data to me at all. This is like the > >>>>>> WiFi MAC address(es) or Bluetooth BD_ADDR. They are > >>>>>> all static information. The only difference is that > >>>>>> they are on the host accessibly filesystem or storage > >>>>>> and not on the device itself. > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> To be honest, for Bluetooth we solved this now. If the > >>>>>> device is missing key information like the calibration > >>>>>> data or BD_ADDR, then it comes up unconfigured. A > >>>>>> userspace process can then go and load the right data > >>>>>> into it and then the device becomes available as > >>>>>> Bluetooth device. > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> Trying to use request_firmware to load some random data > >>>>>> and insist on going through userspace helper for that > >>>>>> sounds crazy to me. Especially since we are trying > >>>>>> hard to get away from the userspace loader. Forcing to > >>>>>> keep it for new stuff sounds backwards to me. > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> With the special Nokia partition in mind, why hasn't > >>>>>> this been turned into a mountable filesystem or into a > >>>>>> driver/subsystem that can access the data direct from > >>>>>> the kernel. I advocated for this some time ago. Maybe > >>>>>> there should be a special subsystem for access to > >>>>>> these factory persistent information that drivers then > >>>>>> just can access. I seem to remember that some systems > >>>>>> provide these via ACPI. Why does the ARM platform has > >>>>>> to be special here? > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> And the problem of getting Ethernet and WiFi MAC > >>>>>> address and Bluetooth BD_ADDR comes up many many > >>>>>> times. Why not have something generic here. And don't > >>>>>> tell me request_firmware is that generic solution ;) > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>=20 > >>>>>> Marcel > >>>>>=20 > >>>>> Hi Marcel. I think you did not understand this problem. > >>>>> This discussion is not about mac address. Please read > >>>>> email thread again and if there are some unclear pars, > >>>>> then ask. Thanks! > >>>>=20 > >>>> I think that I pretty clearly understand the problem. > >>>> Calibration data, MAC address, what is the difference? > >>>> For me this is all the same. It is data that is specific > >>>> to a device or type of devices and it is stored > >>>> somewhere else. In most cases in some immutable > >>>> memory/flash area. > >>>=20 > >>> Those calibration data (in form of binary NVS firmware > >>> file) needs to be sent to wl1251 chip. Mac address is not > >>> needed at this step (and kernel generate some random if > >>> is not provided). > >>>=20 > >>> (Just to note wl1271 driver loads both MAC address and NVS > >>> data via one firmware file which is prepared by userspace, > >>> but this discussion is about wl1251...) > >>>=20 > >>>> What you want is access to this data since the kernel > >>>> driver needs it. Do I get this so far ;) > >>>=20 > >>> Yes, we need to provide NVS data to kernel when kernel ask > >>> for them. > >>>=20 > >>>> So my take is that request_firmware is not the right way > >>>> to get this data. Or more precisely make sure that this > >>>> data is available to kernel drivers. And what I am seeing > >>>> here is that instead of actually solving the bigger > >>>> problem, we just hack around it with request_firmware. > >>>> Now surprisingly the request_firmware loads files > >>>> directly from the kernel and all the hacks do not work > >>>> anymore. > >>>>=20 > >>>> Regards > >>>>=20 > >>>> Marcel > >>>=20 > >>> Just read emails again... > >>>=20 > >>> Our problem is: > >>>=20 > >>> linux-firmware.git tree provides two binary firmware > >>> files: > >>>=20 > >>> ti-connectivity/wl1251-fw.bin > >>> ti-connectivity/wl1251-nvs.bin > >>>=20 > >>> First is firmware file, second NVS file with generic > >>> calibration data. Kernel driver wl1251 now loads both > >>> firmware files via request_firmware. Generic calibration > >>> data are enough for wl1251 chip (it should work). But > >>> devices have own calibration data stored somewhere else. > >>>=20 > >>> On Nokia N900 NVS data are generated on-the-fly from some > >>> bytes from CAL (/dev/mtd1), from state of cellular network > >>> and from some other regulation settings. > >>>=20 > >>> So I think that files stored in linux-firmware.git tree > >>> (which are also installed into /lib/firmware/) should be > >>> loaded with request_firmware function. Or not? Do you > >>> think something else? What other developers think? > >>>=20 > >>> I'm against kernel driver for CAL (/dev/mtd1) for more > >>> reasons: > >>>=20 > >>> 1) we have userspace open source code, but licensed under > >>> GPLv3. And until kernel change license, we cannot include > >>> it. > >>>=20 > >>> 2) NVS data are (probably) not in one place, plus they > >>> depends on something other. > >>>=20 > >>> 3) If manufacture XYZ create new device with its own > >>> storage format of calibration data this means that > >>> correct solution for XYZ is also to implement new kernel > >>> fs driver for its own format. Do you really want to have > >>> in kernel all those drivers for all different > >>> (proprietary) storage formats? > >>>=20 > >>> 4) It does not help us with existence of generic file > >>> /lib/firmware/ti-connectivity/wl1251-nvs.bin which comes > >>> from linux-firmware.git tree. > >>=20 > >> a) change driver to prefer a new "wl1251-nvs-n900.bin" > >> file, > >=20 > > Why to "*-n900.bin" ? wl1251 driver is used on other devices > > too. > >=20 > >> but fall back to "wl1251-nvs.bin" if the first one isn't > >> present > >>=20 > >> b) have a "wl1251-cal-nvs-update" service that, if > >> wl1521-nvs-n900.bin is *not* present mounts the CAL MTD, > >> reads the data, writes it out into wl1521-nvs-n900.bin, and > >> the rmmod/modprobes the driver > >=20 > > Quote: > >> On Nokia N900 NVS data are generated on-the-fly from some > >> bytes from CAL (/dev/mtd1), from state of cellular network > >> and from some other regulation settings. > >=20 > > This basically means to rewrite it every boot or everytime > > when country was changed (for regulation settings). And Ii > > really do not want to do that. > >=20 > > And rmmod is not working on statically linked drivers into > > zImage. So this is not solution. >=20 > actually module removal is still considered a race condition. > If re-loading a module is part of your solution, then you are > already heading into the wrong direction. >=20 No, I'm not doing it and I want to have driver still loaded. > WiFi subsystem have a solution for handling regulatory > enforcement. I don't know why would you try to invent that > same via NVS files. >=20 Both firmware and NVS files are sent to chip as blob data. And=20 they are sent every time when userspace ask to bring interface=20 up. So looks like modprobing driver works without data. Kernel ask=20 for them once userspace want to use wifi network. > >> and done? Stuff that's not N900 just wouldn't ship the > >> update service and would proceed like none of this > >> happened. > >>=20 > >> Dan > >=20 > > Again, what is wrong with userspace firmware helper? I think > > that it fix this problem in a clean way without any hacks > > (like CAL in kernel or creating new FS specially for > > parsing NVS and so on) in kernel. And in userspace we can > > implement program which generate NVS firmware data > > on-the-fly and send them to kernel in compatible format of > > ti-connectivity/wl1251-nvs.bin >=20 > How do you run a userspace firmware helper if the root > filesystem has not yet been mounted? How do you run userspace > helper during resume? >=20 I cannot do that. > Honestly for drivers linked statically into the kernel, the > best approach is that they stay unconfigured until userspace > is available and can run a tool to provide the correct data. >=20 > Regards >=20 > Marcel So ifconfig wlan0 should fail? In our case for wl1251 I think we=20 should fallback to generic NVS data if are available (and maybe=20 later when request will be there again, userspace can provide=20 data). =2D-=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart3380800.rBeIzVeWLx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlSGAnUACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1LB8ACgx4huc1oWxmvIGLtdgZjn+77c TyMAnj5CI9+kiXEzYHc3LwWfjmKqQtsx =ZBz0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3380800.rBeIzVeWLx-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/