Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754523AbaLHUEc (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:04:32 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:46347 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753934AbaLHUEa (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:04:30 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:04:15 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Doug Anderson Cc: Wolfram Sang , Addy Ke , Max Schwarz , Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , Olof Johansson , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Tao Huang , Lin Huang , =?utf-8?B?5aea5pm65oOF?= , Chris , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kever Yang , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Jianqun Xu , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , caesar , Eddie Cai , Han Jiang , Shunqian Zheng , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C spec Message-ID: <20141208200415.GC13486@pengutronix.de> References: <1415261514-4051-1-git-send-email-addy.ke@rock-chips.com> <1418007589-3688-1-git-send-email-addy.ke@rock-chips.com> <20141208085202.GA13486@pengutronix.de> <20141208173432.GA5732@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > So just to summarize for Addy, I think you're being asked to spin one more time. > > 1. Update the patch description as per Uwe. Fix other typos pointed out by him. > > 2. Since you're spinning anyway, adjust "i2c" capitalization to "I2C". > > 3. If you agree with Uwe, rename spec_max_data_hold_ns to > spec_data_valid_ns. If not, we should debate in a followup patch. > > 4. If you think spec_data_hold_buffer_ns could be better represented > in another way (should this be i2c-sda-falling-time-ns"?), please do > so. If not, we should debate in a followup patch. Sounds all reasonable. I'd not address 3 and 4 in this patch, but do this in separate one. (That's what I intended from the beginning, just failed to point that out explicitly.) Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/