Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756818AbaLIM1R (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:27:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:60237 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756257AbaLIM1P (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:27:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:27:08 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" , Jiri Olsa , "eranian@google.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "paulus@samba.org" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "namhyung@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) Message-ID: <20141209122708.GA4189@kernel.org> References: <1417532814-26208-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <20141204142330.GB10406@krava.brq.redhat.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167D124@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20141204155142.GD18689@kernel.org> <20141204160213.GB18631@krava.brq.redhat.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167E1F0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0770167E1F0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:56PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu: > > > > Jiri Wrote: > > > > > looks ok to me.. > > > > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we > > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right? > > > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter. > > > > > > > Peter? > > > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has > > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits. > > > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC > > > > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together. > > Hi Peter, The ones that are just prep patches I am merging now, Jiri, can I stick an Acked-by to the non-LBR related ones? > I have verified that the V8 kernel part patch is compatible with both latest > tip and latest perf/core. We don't need to rebase. > The user perf tool for tip is not updated yet. We need to merge latest > perf/core to tip before applying user part patch. > > Do you have more comments for the code? > > The latest kernel and user part codes are here. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/6/432 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/396 > > Thanks, > Kan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/