Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754230AbaLIWwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:52:17 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:59935 "EHLO mail-qa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753213AbaLIWwN (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:52:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1418114172.4779.22.camel@leyfoon-vm> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:52:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pXxfn-igufQpYNjbuPUIy2svxK8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/nios2 for v3.19 From: Linus Torvalds To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ley Foon Tan , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List , LeyFoon Tan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > It's a bit sad that all the reviewed/acked-by information which has > been sent throughout the review process is completely lost. Yes. In general, it would probably be a great idea to just include pointers to acks etc, and I can add them to the merge commit. Arnd's ack got through simply because he replied to the pull request in time before I pulled, but that's usually not really going to work, so just having the maintainer gather up the acks and present them at pull time would be a good idea. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/