Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:24:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:24:28 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:2760 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:24:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3E10A067.9080809@hannes-reinecke.de> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:37:11 +0100 From: Hannes Reinecke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jochen Friedrich CC: Markus Pfeiffer , Sam Ravnborg , Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Alpha port still maintained in 2.5 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1056 Lines: 36 Jochen Friedrich wrote: > Hi Markus, > > >>Anyway, I just installed BitKeeper and start finding my way into the code... > > > Maybe setting up an own repository (like the parisc, mips, m68k, etc > people currently do using CVS) would also be a good idea, just to test out > stuff before pushing it into the main tree and to have a common code base > to work on. > > This way we could apply e.g. the module patch from kernel.org and fix the > remaining parts. > I'm all for it. The important bit would be to get those who really matter (i.e. Richard Henderson, Ivan K. et al) to cooperate with it. Otherwise it's just a waste of time, since in doubt their patches have a far better chance being incorporated into the main tree than ours ... > just my 0,02 EURO > --jochen Same here. Cheers, Hannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/