Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:05:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:05:26 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:47081 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:05:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:12:24 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Ed Tomlinson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads Message-ID: <20021230221224.GP29422@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Ed Tomlinson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200212301645.50278.tomlins@cam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212301645.50278.tomlins@cam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 520 Lines: 16 On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 04:45:50PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > The o(1) scheduler is an interesting beast. It handles most workloads O(1) is very, very different from o(1). Don't skip that shift key! Also see: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/AsymptoticNotation.html Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/