Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758090AbaLJQmW (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:42:22 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:46609 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756427AbaLJQmS (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:42:18 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andy Lutomirski , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Richard Weinberger Cc: Linux Containers , Josh Triplett , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Michael Kerrisk-manpages , Linux API , linux-man , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , LSM , Casey Schaufler , Kenton Varda , stable References: <52e0643bd47b1e5c65921d6e00aea1f724bb510a.1417281801.git.luto@amacapital.net> <87h9xez20g.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw75ygwp.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87fvcxyf28.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <874mtdyexp.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a935u3nj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87388xodlj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87h9x5re41.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6xpzb0.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87ppbtn4mv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a92xn2io.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r3w8liw4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87iohklfvj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:39:57 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87iohklfvj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:36:48 -0600") Message-ID: <87mw6vh31e.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/qI6gjvau49ngORbqUFsR4eDeiWAEv2g0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.210.55 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4897] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Andy Lutomirski , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Richard Weinberger X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 688 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.4%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.3%), parse: 0.80 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 1.77 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.39 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.7 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.13 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 0.92 (0.1%), tests_pri_-400: 20 (2.9%), check_bayes: 19 (2.8%), b_tokenize: 4.5 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (0.8%), b_comp_prob: 1.42 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 4.2 (0.6%), b_finish: 2.2 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 645 (93.7%), tests_pri_500: 3.6 (0.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:52 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Will people please test these patches with their container project? These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it. I really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks userspace again. The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for /proc//setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the functionality of the patchset. With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/