Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758361AbaLJXWR (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:22:17 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:41939 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758073AbaLJXWN (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:22:13 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-man , Kees Cook , Linux API , Linux Containers , Josh Triplett , stable , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , Kenton Varda , LSM , Michael Kerrisk-manpages , Casey Schaufler , Andrew Morton References: <87h9x5re41.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6xpzb0.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87ppbtn4mv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a92xn2io.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r3w8liw4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87iohklfvj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6vh31e.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20141210224822.GG20012@ubuntumail> <5488CE4D.1000606@nod.at> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:19:55 -0600 In-Reply-To: <5488CE4D.1000606@nod.at> (Richard Weinberger's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:50:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87r3w7f5yc.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18EpkNzOfDMawacCsJ+iH6WK80kTa/91Ik= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.210.55 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Richard Weinberger X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 265 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.3 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 1.62 (0.6%), parse: 0.58 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (4.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.87 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 7 (2.6%), tests_pri_-950: 0.98 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 0.86 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 20 (7.7%), check_bayes: 19 (7.3%), b_tokenize: 5.0 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (2.6%), b_comp_prob: 1.71 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.4 (0.9%), b_finish: 0.63 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 214 (80.8%), tests_pri_500: 5 (2.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:52 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard Weinberger writes: > Am 10.12.2014 um 23:48 schrieb Serge Hallyn: >> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >>> >>> Will people please test these patches with their container project? >>> >>> These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if >>> I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it. I >>> really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks >>> userspace again. >>> >>> The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for >>> /proc//setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the >>> functionality of the patchset. >>> >>> With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily >>> reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP. >>> >>> Eric >> >> Is there a git tree we can clone? > > I was about to ask that too. > Hopefully I can tomorrow find some time for testing. git pull git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-testing That holds my entire queue of fixes against 3.18-rc6 Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/