Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758518AbaLKBa2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:30:28 -0500 Received: from mail-by2on0114.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.100.114]:20448 "EHLO na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758449AbaLKBaY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:30:24 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: CC: , Scott Wood Subject: [PATCH] memory/fsl-corenet-cf: Add t1040 support Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:56:22 -0600 Message-ID: <1418259382-21697-1-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [192.88.168.50] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN1PR08CA0042.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.242.217.170) To BY2PR0301MB0725.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.63.155) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0725; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0725; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0422860ED4 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(21056001)(107046002)(50226001)(87976001)(50466002)(106356001)(110136001)(77156002)(48376002)(62966003)(2351001)(229853001)(46102003)(4396001)(33646002)(68736005)(101416001)(19580395003)(230783001)(86362001)(50986999)(19580405001)(42186005)(40100003)(66066001)(64706001)(122386002)(47776003)(20776003)(99396003)(97736003)(120916001)(89996001)(31966008)(36756003)(105586002)(92566001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0725;H:snotra.am.freescale.net;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0725; X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org T1040 has a different version of corenet-cf, despite being incorrectly labelled with a fsl,corenet2-cf compatible. The t1040 version of corenet-cf has a version register that can be read to distinguish. The t4240/b4860 version officially does not, but testing shows that it does and has a different value, so use that. If somehow this ends up not being reliable and we treat a t4240/b4860 as a t1040 (the reverse should not happen, as t1040's version register is official), currently the worst that should happen is writing to reserved bits to enable events that don't exist. The changes to the t1040 version of corenet-cf that this driver cares about are the addition of two new error events. There are also changes to the format of cecar2, which is printed, but not interpreted, by this driver. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood --- drivers/memory/fsl-corenet-cf.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/memory/fsl-corenet-cf.c b/drivers/memory/fsl-corenet-cf.c index c9443fc..94c952e 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/fsl-corenet-cf.c +++ b/drivers/memory/fsl-corenet-cf.c @@ -27,18 +27,29 @@ enum ccf_version { struct ccf_info { enum ccf_version version; int err_reg_offs; + bool has_brr; }; static const struct ccf_info ccf1_info = { .version = CCF1, .err_reg_offs = 0xa00, + .has_brr = false, }; static const struct ccf_info ccf2_info = { .version = CCF2, .err_reg_offs = 0xe40, + .has_brr = true, }; +/* + * This register is present but not documented, with different values for + * IP_ID, on other chips with fsl,corenet2-cf such as t4240 and b4860. + */ +#define CCF_BRR 0xbf8 +#define CCF_BRR_IPID 0xffff0000 +#define CCF_BRR_IPID_T1040 0x09310000 + static const struct of_device_id ccf_matches[] = { { .compatible = "fsl,corenet1-cf", @@ -66,6 +77,8 @@ struct ccf_err_regs { /* LAE/CV also valid for errdis and errinten */ #define ERRDET_LAE (1 << 0) /* Local Access Error */ #define ERRDET_CV (1 << 1) /* Coherency Violation */ +#define ERRDET_UTID (1 << 2) /* Unavailable Target ID (t1040) */ +#define ERRDET_MCST (1 << 3) /* Multicast Stash (t1040) */ #define ERRDET_CTYPE_SHIFT 26 /* Capture Type (ccf2 only) */ #define ERRDET_CTYPE_MASK (0x1f << ERRDET_CTYPE_SHIFT) #define ERRDET_CAP (1 << 31) /* Capture Valid (ccf2 only) */ @@ -84,6 +97,7 @@ struct ccf_private { struct device *dev; void __iomem *regs; struct ccf_err_regs __iomem *err_regs; + bool t1040; }; static irqreturn_t ccf_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) @@ -142,6 +156,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ccf_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) if (errdet & ERRDET_CV) dev_crit(ccf->dev, "Coherency Violation\n"); + if (errdet & ERRDET_UTID) + dev_crit(ccf->dev, "Unavailable Target ID\n"); + + if (errdet & ERRDET_MCST) + dev_crit(ccf->dev, "Multicast Stash\n"); + if (cap_valid) { dev_crit(ccf->dev, "address 0x%09llx, src id 0x%x\n", addr, src_id); @@ -157,6 +177,7 @@ static int ccf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct ccf_private *ccf; struct resource *r; const struct of_device_id *match; + u32 errinten; int ret, irq; match = of_match_device(ccf_matches, &pdev->dev); @@ -183,6 +204,13 @@ static int ccf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ccf->info = match->data; ccf->err_regs = ccf->regs + ccf->info->err_reg_offs; + if (ccf->info->has_brr) { + u32 brr = ioread32be(ccf->regs + CCF_BRR); + + if ((brr & CCF_BRR_IPID) == CCF_BRR_IPID_T1040) + ccf->t1040 = true; + } + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ccf); irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); @@ -197,15 +225,19 @@ static int ccf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return ret; } + errinten = ERRDET_LAE | ERRDET_CV; + if (ccf->t1040) + errinten |= ERRDET_UTID | ERRDET_MCST; + switch (ccf->info->version) { case CCF1: /* On CCF1 this register enables rather than disables. */ - iowrite32be(ERRDET_LAE | ERRDET_CV, &ccf->err_regs->errdis); + iowrite32be(errinten, &ccf->err_regs->errdis); break; case CCF2: iowrite32be(0, &ccf->err_regs->errdis); - iowrite32be(ERRDET_LAE | ERRDET_CV, &ccf->err_regs->errinten); + iowrite32be(errinten, &ccf->err_regs->errinten); break; } -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/