Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758583AbaLKT1p (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:27:45 -0500 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65279 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756081AbaLKT1m (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:27:42 -0500 Message-ID: <5489F025.9010907@nod.at> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:27:33 +0100 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-man , Kees Cook , Linux API , Linux Containers , Josh Triplett , stable , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kenton Varda , LSM , Michael Kerrisk-manpages , Casey Schaufler , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series? References: <87h9x5re41.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6xpzb0.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87ppbtn4mv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a92xn2io.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r3w8liw4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87iohklfvj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6vh31e.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20141210224822.GG20012@ubuntumail> <5488CE4D.1000606@nod.at> <87r3w7f5yc.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> In-Reply-To: <87r3w7f5yc.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 11.12.2014 um 00:19 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: > Richard Weinberger writes: > >> Am 10.12.2014 um 23:48 schrieb Serge Hallyn: >>> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >>>> >>>> Will people please test these patches with their container project? >>>> >>>> These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if >>>> I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it. I >>>> really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks >>>> userspace again. >>>> >>>> The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for >>>> /proc//setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the >>>> functionality of the patchset. >>>> >>>> With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily >>>> reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP. >>>> >>>> Eric >>> >>> Is there a git tree we can clone? >> >> I was about to ask that too. >> Hopefully I can tomorrow find some time for testing. > > git pull git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-testing > > That holds my entire queue of fixes against 3.18-rc6 So far nothing broke on my libvirt-lxc test bed. :-) Tested with openSUSE 13.2 and libvirt 1.2.9. Tested-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/