Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:29:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:29:08 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:406 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 01:29:07 -0500 Message-ID: <3E113B25.534BEBE4@digeo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 22:37:25 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.52 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] vm swappiness with contest References: <200212271646.01487.conman@kolivas.net> <200212311658.53118.conman@kolivas.net> <3E11347B.2C8195D1@digeo.com> <200212311724.05416.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Dec 2002 06:37:26.0270 (UTC) FILETIME=[153D89E0:01C2B097] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1733 Lines: 51 Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 Dec 2002 5:08 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Con Kolivas wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Saturday 28 Dec 2002 5:16 pm, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > Is there something about the filesystem layer or elsewhere in the > > > > kernel that could decay or fragment over time that only a reboot can > > > > fix? This would seem to be a bad thing. > > > > > > Ok Linus suggested I check slabinfo before and after. > > > > > > I ran contest for a few days till I recreated the problem and it did > > > recur. I don't know how to interpret the information so I'll just dump it > > > here: > > > > Looks OK. Could we see /proc/meminfo and /proc/vmstat? > > meminfo: > MemTotal: 257296 kB > MemFree: 47468 kB > Buffers: 27028 kB > Cached: 7480 kB > SwapCached: 272 kB > Active: 154968 kB > Inactive: 42756 kB > HighTotal: 0 kB > HighFree: 0 kB > LowTotal: 257296 kB > LowFree: 47468 kB > SwapTotal: 4194272 kB > SwapFree: 4193816 kB > Dirty: 1116 kB > Writeback: 0 kB > Mapped: 3740 kB > Slab: 8564 kB > Committed_AS: 6580 kB > PageTables: 196 kB > ReverseMaps: 1381 > These numbers _look_ wrong, but ext3 truncate does funny things. Could you now run a big usemem/fillmem application to try to allocate and use 200 megs of memory, then resend /proc/meminfo? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/