Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965557AbaLKWEG (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:04:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:52592 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933922AbaLKWED (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:04:03 -0500 Message-ID: <548A14D0.7080605@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:04:00 -0800 From: Alexander Duyck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, peterz@infradead.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, mikey@neuling.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, donald.c.skidmore@intel.com, matthew.vick@intel.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nic_swsd@realtek.com, will.deacon@arm.com, michael@ellerman.id.au, tony.luck@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, fweisbec@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] arch: Add lightweight memory barriers for coherent memory access References: <20141125203310.8240.27370.stgit@ahduyck-server> <54892B87.3020909@gmail.com> <20141211.153204.228153607927530694.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20141211.153204.228153607927530694.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/2014 12:32 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexander Duyck > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:28:39 -0800 > >> It occurs to me that I never got a sign off from any of the maintainers >> on getting this pulled in. >> >> Since the merge window is open I was wondering which tree I should make >> sure these patches apply to and who will be the one to pull them in? >> Since I was modifying network drivers should I resubmit them for netdev, >> or should I submit them for asm-generic or some other tree? > I have no problem taking this via my tree, but I want to see agreement > from other interested parties. I'll resubmit them as a net-next submission after I verify that they still apply cleanly and there aren't any build issues. - Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/