Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935116AbaLLQzo (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:55:44 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:54660 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934379AbaLLQzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:55:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1418403328.3599.85.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.65-rc1 review From: Ben Hutchings To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Satoru Takeuchi , Phil Jensen , akpm@linux-foundation.org Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:55:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20141212162623.GC28564@roeck-us.net> References: <20141212162623.GC28564@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FrtDs7i1xpJOHAtiCcd5" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:c97:8151:cc89:c28d X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-FrtDs7i1xpJOHAtiCcd5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 08:26 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:14:25AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.65 release. > > There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > >=20 > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 14 06:14:25 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >=20 > Build results: > total: 111 pass: 107 fail: 4 > Failed builds: > arm:mxs_defconfig > mips:allmodconfig > xtensa:defconfig > xtensa:allmodconfig >=20 > Qemu tests: > total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0 >=20 > The arm build failure looks like it is new, but it is due to 'Inconsisten= t > kallsyms data' which I see randomly with arm builds, so it is not a real > concern. It may show up now because I switched from the Yocto 1.4.2 toolc= hain > to Yocto 1.7; as result some previously failing arm builds now pass while > others now fail. >=20 > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Thanks for checking. I caught a couple of build failures with your build server before sending these out for review. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your own home. - Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman, `Good Omens' --=-FrtDs7i1xpJOHAtiCcd5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIVAwUAVIseBee/yOyVhhEJAQoD9g//V/boUlIjWVOLmjxSGy8R61YLQnbRv+JB ht74IygX+aXEfA0OtxiU3SBMe9n1DmVB9ZpX9YSwLp2YyRjCRK0ZrlMzhFswbjms SEYvoilgQoKXyk0L1iBcIwlb9/SYjpZP1AEG9F4L1ad1aseoat+NDLpfem9lUwXV ecrLtjJ6JKVgwP4APEHFC9hNpRZ+QNL0Jkv0VwMpnTJCbuiw2qL6KuzShrfsWaSQ SUVkFmybraTK3xX4LsAFQJwKTw4Kk+Elj+ct4Pxsks9nCL3E/ehOCyMvED6STmlL 7AcwM4i5WTpyWXzNr54ko8c156teLNGXChKK7haRFqw3gzR7pYVF7iw+w8KQeuxy UMkeg9fN0KYQwE8z117uNXxdiX+eUwLWKPjt4A5/sRDuNoWiiXK06ffi7ls6etu5 iIxiwghw1oNTuXs2+9wUvOmFXl0tBSLNYpessYOGmPyaxOierXcawDw0JjS4sxSE vEUYZVumF9eQgFmCM8vpyNSgtDspTJYhVNrX00v5zDh4+Z/FxHlimV0pxETqjc91 8RisSosjHZ0FYbHMLPVdOtFeVY+6aki1a0gDIY9lkvs5rzN3q4KrrhKbcCgEpTr8 fMk1mMmFLxg57YBOilQb4i3PJg3SHoDSZk19aQQn2FSrFdw2RhWbF0U7VCauNH/o HJjToB02Lo8= =2pH7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FrtDs7i1xpJOHAtiCcd5-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/