Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031068AbaLLRZv (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:25:51 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:55491 "EHLO mail-qc0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030832AbaLLRZu (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:25:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:25:46 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yasuaki Ishimatsu , "Gu, Zheng" , tangchen , Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: fixup existing pool->node Message-ID: <20141212172546.GC20020@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1418379595-6281-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> <1418379595-6281-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1418379595-6281-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:19:53PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Yasuaki Ishimatsu hit a bug when the numa mapping between CPU and node > is changed. And the previous path fixup wq_numa_possible_cpumask. > (See more information form the changelog of that patch) > > After wq_numa_possible_cpumask was updated, the new pool->node will be > correct, but the existing pools (and workers) are still running, some of > them are running with the wrong pool->node, or even worse, with pool->node > which is quitted node, they create_worker() on wrong pool->node. > These create_worker() may create workers on wrong node or failed without > any progress (when with pool->node which is quitted node). > > So we need to update the pool->node when the numa mapping is changed. > > We simply re-calc the pool->node when the numa mapping changed. It reuses > the code from get_unbound_pool() for unbound pool. I don't get this patch. If a node is gone, all its cpus would be gone and the pool should be discarded. If a new node comes online with different mappings, new sets of pools should serve them instead of recycling the old ones. Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to make sure we don't reuse the pools w/ old mappings for new pwqs? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/