Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:35:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:35:37 -0500 Received: from ext-ch1gw-3.online-age.net ([216.34.191.37]:24315 "EHLO ext-ch1gw-3.online-age.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:35:36 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Heater, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, VMIC)" To: "'Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima'" , Herman Oosthuysen Cc: lkml Subject: RE: Indention - why spaces? Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:43:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 869 Lines: 25 > indent itself dosen't have a 'Linux standard' BUT > .../linux/scripts/Lindent > is there to get things right (in terms of CodingStyle) Thanks, I wasn't aware of that one, but had created my own version. A couple more gallons of fuel to the flame :) >From .../linux/scripts/Lindent: indent -kr -i8 -ts8 -sob -l80 -ss -bs -psl "$@" -psl: seams to be inconsistent with much of the kernel code. 6 == half dozen IMHO. -sob: Ackkk! I prefer to have two blank lines between functions. I think it just makes things easier for the eyes to parse. But in general, I'd say respect the authors judgement in use of blank lines. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/