Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 12:57:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 12:57:20 -0500 Received: from smtp-outbound.cwctv.net ([213.104.18.10]:56387 "EHLO smtp.cwctv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 12:57:19 -0500 From: To: riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:05:32 +0000 Subject: Re: GPL and Nvidia MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Liberate TVMail 2.6 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1041444332499" Message-ID: <0c1c12302180113DTVMAIL8@smtp.cwctv.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2627 Lines: 70 --1041444332499 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit and how would it work otherwise? without GPL include/files? magic? divine act of god? Dean. Three ways to kill yourself, and ive been drove in one... On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:35:10 -0200 (BRST) Rik van Riel wrote: --1041444332499 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.116]) by smtp.cwctv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44); Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:33:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]:30685 "EHLO localhost") by imladris.surriel.com with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:35:26 -0200 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:35:10 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "" Subject: Re: GPL and Nvidia In-Reply-To: <076541035040113DTVMAIL10@smtp.cwctv.net> Message-ID: References: <076541035040113DTVMAIL10@smtp.cwctv.net> X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-Path: riel@conectiva.com.br On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote: > lets see, In Britain we dont have "lawyers" we have solicitors, "no > legal ground" yes I do have legal ground, having the hardware is > irrelevent, I have the drivers, the "improperly" licensed drivers as > they are, I dont discriminate againtst nvidia users, I am unhappy I cant > help them with those modules, they include GPL routines Where is your proof that nvidia includes copyrightable GPL routines in their driver ? Without such proof, you have no grounds to make an accusation against nvidia. Yes, I am at times annoyed by getting reports about "kernel bugs" that turn out to be caused by the nvidia driver, but that doesn't change the fact that that driver is made by nvidia and they get to decide if and how they want to publish it. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com --1041444332499-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/