Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751074AbaLPG1z (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:27:55 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]:60739 "EHLO mail-la0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbaLPG1y (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:27:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <54584260.8030602@nvidia.com> <545895B2.2000101@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:27:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible regression with commit 52221610d From: Bjorn Andersson To: Tim Kryger Cc: Ulf Hansson , Alexandre Courbot , Sachin Kamat , linux-mmc , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Tim Kryger wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: [..] >> Or simply; what is vmmc (in the code) supposed to represent? > > Hi Bjorn, > > VMMC is the supply that delivers power out to the SD card itself (aka VDD). > > It is not the internal power rail/power domain of the host controller > within the SoC. > Thanks for you answer Tim, I'll write up a patch for the Qualcomm driver that add the possibility of specifying an internal supply for the devices where that uses that. My only concern is that for any standard compliant sdhci driver we're supposed to have a info printout that vmmc was not found (but vqmmc is there). But I guess that's a matter of proper documentation and hoping people don't pay too much attention to it? Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/