Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751103AbaLPJBp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:01:45 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:50512 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbaLPJBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:01:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:01:28 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Baoquan He Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, Waiman.Long@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwlocks: clean up of qrwlock Message-ID: <20141216090128.GU3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1418709640-5625-1-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1418709640-5625-1-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > In queue_read_lock_slowpath, when writer count becomes 0, we need > increment the read count and get the lock. Then need call > rspin_until_writer_unlock to check again if an incoming writer > steals the lock in the gap. But in rspin_until_writer_unlock > it only checks the writer count, namely low 8 bit of lock->cnts, > no need to subtract the reader count unit specifically. So remove > that subtraction to make it clearer, rspin_until_writer_unlock > just takes the actual lock->cnts as the 2nd argument. > > And also change the code comment in queue_write_lock_slowpath to > make it more exact and explicit. > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He > --- > kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c > index f956ede..ae66c10 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ void queue_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) > while (atomic_read(&lock->cnts) & _QW_WMASK) > cpu_relax_lowlatency(); > > - cnts = atomic_add_return(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts) - _QR_BIAS; > + cnts = atomic_add_return(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts); > rspin_until_writer_unlock(lock, cnts); Did you actually look at the ASM generated? I suspect your change makes it bigger. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/