Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750936AbaLPJXi (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:23:38 -0500 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:65278 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbaLPJXe (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:23:34 -0500 Message-ID: <548FFA0D.7060008@nod.at> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:23:25 +0100 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski , "Eric W. Biederman" CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Containers , Josh Triplett , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Michael Kerrisk-manpages , Linux API , linux-man , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , LSM , Casey Schaufler , Kenton Varda , stable Subject: Re: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series? References: <52e0643bd47b1e5c65921d6e00aea1f724bb510a.1417281801.git.luto@amacapital.net> <87fvcxyf28.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <874mtdyexp.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a935u3nj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87388xodlj.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87h9x5re41.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6xpzb0.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87ppbtn4mv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87a92xn2io.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87r3w8liw4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87iohklfvj.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87mw6vh31e.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 16.12.2014 um 03:05 schrieb Andy Lutomirski: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> >> Will people please test these patches with their container project? >> >> These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if >> I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it. I >> really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks >> userspace again. >> >> The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for >> /proc//setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the >> functionality of the patchset. >> >> With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily >> reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP. > > > I tested this with Sandstorm. It breaks as is and it works if I add > the setgroups thing. > > Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski # breaks things as designed :( > > I still don't like the name "setgroups". I agree that the name is not optimal. But I don't have a counterproposal as my naming skills are miserable. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/