Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:58:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:58:48 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:27144 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:58:47 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200301012006.h01K6YAg002278@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: Raw data from dedicated kernel bug database To: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 20:06:34 +0000 (GMT) Cc: mbligh@aracnet.com, hannal@us.ibm.com, eli.carter@inet.com, rddunlap@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030101194019.GZ5607@work.bitmover.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Jan 01, 2003 11:40:19 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1994 Lines: 43 > What are the chances that the raw data from the kernel bugdb could be > made available? I bet Bradford wants it and I know I want. ^^^^^^^^ I do have a first name, you know :-). It would be nice to have some more bugs listed in my new database - at the moment there is only one, but I was reluctant to spend time manually filling it, when that time could be better spent improving the system itself. Importing the existing data in to my database isn't going to automatically give you all of the advantages of it, because it's ability to search via config options, and track version information obviously relies on that information being present, but it would be simple enough for someone, (me, if nobody else is interested), to add it one the database is populated. I'm working on adding more features at the moment, but if you've got feedback, (positive or negative), please let me hear it - traffic to it has been pretty high, but I'm not getting much mail about it. Personally, I think the ability to upload your .config file, and have it say, "OK, the following bugs are known to be triggered by those options", and to have a colour-coded table of working/broken/untested/can't test kernel versions for each bug could potentially save us all loads of work, but if you disagree, just let me know. > To calm any fears that we are trying to take over the bugdb, we're not. > We just want to track it. Any changes made in a BK bugdb are trivially > exportable to an external format and if the need arises we'll work with > IBM/OSDL to make that happen. In fact, we can automate it. Let me know if I can add some kind of export function to my DB that will help BK users, Larry^WMcVoy, and I'll consider it. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/